Sponsored in part by... Freeverse Freeverse, Inc.'s SOUND STUDIO 3.5.5 - Sound Studio is for anyone
who needs to record or edit audio with a professional tool, but at
a consumer price. Perfect for Podcasts, Music, More! Now updated
for OS X 10.5 Leopard. <http://www.freeverse.com/soundstudio>

 [F] TidBITS  / TidBITS  / TidBITS Talk  /

An overabundance of drives

[McCabe, Steve]Steve McCabe - 09:23am Apr 1, 2008 PST
Guest User

Hi, folks

I'd like to seek your input and sage counsel with regard to an issue my
wife's having at work. She works as a graphic designer in PC-heavy
organisation, and made the provision of a Mac a condition of her employment.
They bought her, back in November, a new Mac Pro. Leopard was the installed
OS, and so she bought an external FireWire 500GB hard disc for Time Machine.

Recently, following all manner of grief and headaches with power glitches
and failing hard discs (it would all take too long to explain...) here's
what is available to us:

Mac Pro
500GB internal hard discs (two of them)
250GB internal hard disc (one)
500GB external hard disc (one).

She's currently in negotiation with the IT manager (who seems to want to
blow smoke whenever he's faced with a question; when my wife asked why she
couldn't email attachments greater than 2MB via the company's Outlook
server, he first told her that this nothing to do with the company's server,
but because "Other ISPs only accept incoming attachments up to 2MB," and
when she called him on that, he then said it was because "You're trying to
send a MIME file [sic]") about how best to use these resources.

Here's his suggestion:

"Image of the current internal 250GB [sic, again]" on the internal 250GB
disc
System and applications go on one internal 500GB disc.
Documents go on the external 500GB disc.
Second internal 500GB disc kept in the workshop as a spare.

I'm not entirely convinced that this is the optimal means of exploiting
these resources. Here's what I'm thinking:

System and applications go on the internal 250GB disc.
The two internal 500GB discs are combined in a RAID level 1 500GB array to
provide data security.
The external 500GB hard disc is used as a Time Machine backup of the
internal 500GB volume.

I like my solution (gosh, there's a shocker): it uses all resources, and
provides a *very* robust level of data security, with both redundancy and
backups. In my humility (one of the most wonderful of my many wonderful
characteristics), however, I would be grateful for any other suggestions
that anyone might like to offer for the best way to use the devices that are
available.

Are there any functional or practical issues associated with my solution? I
realise that some things (Microsoft Entourage database, for example) do need
to be kept in particular places in the user's home directory on the startup
volume, but other than that, is there anything screamingly foolish that I'm
missing?

I look forward to wise and knowledgeable guidance...

Thanks
Steve




Mark as Read
  OutlineAll MessagesOlder MessagesOldest MessagesNewest MessagesNewer Messages

Lewis Butler (apparently) - Apr 2, 2008 2:38 am (#1 Total: 4)  

Reply to this message
via email  

Photo of Author
Posts: 928
Re: An overabundance of drives

On 1-Apr-2008, at 10:23, Steve McCabe wrote:
> System and applications go on the internal 250GB disc.
> The two internal 500GB discs are combined in a RAID level 1 500GB
> array to
> provide data security.
> The external 500GB hard disc is used as a Time Machine backup of the
> internal 500GB volume.


This is the best solution if you want to preserve the data.

As you said, you have redundancy on the RAID1 *AND* you have
incremental backups.

Seems like a no brainer to me.

Course, what I would do is RAID0 the 500MBs, but then i'd rather have
space than redundancy.

Jochen Wolters (apparently) - Apr 3, 2008 10:52 am (#2 Total: 4)  

Reply to this message
via email  

Photo of Author
Posts: 129
Re: An overabundance of drives

> "Second internal 500GB disc kept in the workshop as a spare."
>

Great suggestion, that. :D


> Are there any functional or practical issues associated with my
> solution?
>

Your solution sounds great, but there is one not-so-minor issue, and
that is the lack of an off-site backup.

If there is some other means of making sure that the files your wife
is working with are safe even if the office building burns down (to
mention just one stereotypical worst case scenario), she might just as
well implement what you are suggesting. Otherwise, how's this:

* IF she does require versioned backups:

- 250GB int. - OS and apps
- 500GB int. - data files
- 500GB int. - Time Machine target drive (note that this may
                run out of disk space soon, depending how much
                data is on the actual 500G work drive...)
- 500GB ext. - Clone of the Time Machine target drive, updated
                at least once a month, and stored in a safe
                place off-site

* IF she can live with just having a backup copy of the current files
on her machine (i.e., no versioning):

- 250GB int. - OS and apps
- 500GB int. - data files (RAID 1 config)
- 500GB int. /
- 500GB ext. - Clone of the RAID array's data, stored off-site


In both cases, one issue remains: there is no bootable backup of the
OS/apps drive, so if that one fails, your wife may loose quite a bit
of creative time for re-installing the OS and the applications.


Regards,

Jochen.


--
Jochen Wolters
jochenpolytropia.com | http://polytropia.com | jochenwolters (Skype)




jlg - Apr 3, 2008 11:09 am (#3 Total: 4)  

Reply to this message
 

Photo of Author
Posts: 2
Re: An overabundance of drives

My (unsatisfactory) backup solution for my iMac Intel with an (almost full) internal 500g drive has been to use an external 500g with TimeMachine and another external 500g with SuperDuper. All my drives are nearing capacity, with the culprits as usual being iTune downloads, photographs and videos. It is clear that everything needs to be upgraded. Does anyone have a suggestion re best moves to make in this situation?( I know this will cost!)

Thanks to everyone.

James Green

dholaday - Apr 8, 2008 10:16 am (#4 Total: 4)  

Reply to this message
 

Photo of Author
Posts: 2
Re: An overabundance of drives

Steve:

I couldn't tell if there are any economic constraints but given the price of hard drives I suggest that the external, Time Machine, drive should be 1TB. You could use the existing 500GB external drive for cloning the 250GB system/apps drive [security and bootable backup]. [Or, if it is a SATA drive, cannibalize it and use as a 4th internal drive for same purpose.]

$.02 Duncan



  OutlineAll MessagesOlder MessagesOldest MessagesNewest MessagesNewer Messages


 [F] TidBITS  / TidBITS  / TidBITS Talk  / An overabundance of drives




Add a message

To add a message to this discussion, you must be a registered user. Enter your email address below. If you have an account associated with the email address you enter, you will be prompted for your password. If not, you'll be able to create a new account with no fuss.

Enter your email address:

Submit