<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- RSS generated by Web Crossing(r) Unix-v6.0 built Oct  8 2008 13:12:02 (source:1163 2008-09-24 11:42:21 -0700)/-6.0 on 2010-03-15-05.25.15 GMT -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<atom:link href="http://emperor.tidbits.com/webx/.3cf38a4b/rssFeed/synopsis.xml" rel="self"></atom:link>
<title>TidBITS: Why AT&amp;T Has a Lock on the iPhone</title>
<link>http://emperor.tidbits.com/webx/tidbits-talk</link>
<description><![CDATA[Thanks for this well reasoned article.  I've tried to tell my friends  <br>
that it isn't likely that there will be a Verizon iPhone in the near  <br>
future.  Even though Verizon says that they will start to deploy their  <br>
4G LTE network next year, that doesn't mean that there will be  <br>
sufficient network coverage to base an LTE iPhone on.  Also, people  <br>
forget the other half of the equation, which are the chips.  Remember  <br>
the iPhone debuted with an EDGE chip, because the then current 3G  <br>
chips used too much power.<br>
<br>
As you pointed out in your article, it is really a two piece puzzle.   <br>
Mature network, and mature hardware.<br>
<br>
CVBruce<br>
]]></description>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:10:07 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Web Crossing(r) Unix-v6.0 built Oct  8 2008 13:12:02 (source:1163 2008-09-24 11:42:21 -0700)/Macintosh-OSX-10.4-6.0 (http://webcrossing.com/)</generator>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
</channel>
</rss>
