<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- RSS generated by Web Crossing(r) Unix-v6.0 built Oct  8 2008 13:12:02 (source:1163 2008-09-24 11:42:21 -0700)/-6.0 on 2010-03-16-23.37.31 GMT -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<atom:link href="http://emperor.tidbits.com/webx/.3ce08ed7/rssFeed/synopsis.xml" rel="self"></atom:link>
<title>TidBITS: New iPods: Is iPod Classic Going Away?</title>
<link>http://emperor.tidbits.com/webx/tidbits-talk</link>
<description><![CDATA[I agree with your assessment about the iPod Classic. The original iPod<br>
was a 5Gb device and seemed quite expansive at the time. The 160Gb was<br>
probably not a big seller because it was simply too big. Does anyone<br>
really need to store 40,000 songs or 170 hours of video. Heck, until<br>
recently, you couldn't even get computers with that much disk space.<br>
<br>
The only remaining iPod Classic is the 120Gb model (which is still<br>
bigger than most laptops). But, we are seeing the Nano nibbling down<br>
at the lower end. What was originally a 4Gb player, the Nano at 16Gb<br>
is now large enough to store most people's music and video collection.<br>
Next year, the 32Gb Nano will be out. Since there are few games for<br>
the iPod Classic, it is mainly used to store songs, video, and photos.<br>
Unless you have extensive collections of these, most of that diskspace<br>
sits empty. I have a 30Gb iPod classic, and I have what I think of as<br>
an extensive music collection, and almost half of my iPod sits empty.<br>
Most of the kids I know seem to have no problems storing their music<br>
on 8Gb iPod Nanos.<br>
<br>
The iPod Touch is obviously the wave of the future for Apple. Now at<br>
32Gb capacity, it really can do everything an iPhone can do except<br>
take pictures and make phone calls (neither of these things are<br>
standout features of the iPhone anyway). I look at it as about 10Gb to<br>
16Gb to store most people's music collection, and the rest for games<br>
and other applications. Within the next year, the capacity will be up<br>
to 64Gb. With the new improved iPod Nano taking over the pure music<br>
player market and the iPod Touch as a more complete Internet enabled<br>
device, there really isn't much room in the lineup for the iPod<br>
Classic anymore. By next year, it will go the way of the Plymouth and<br>
Oldsmobile.<br>
<br>
By the way, back in February, I was looking at the iPod Touch as a<br>
replacement for my Palm PDA which I had stopped using. In June, the<br>
third party applications were tempting me to go ahead and buy, but the<br>
fact that it didn't have an external speaker meant that it couldn't<br>
beep when I had an appointment. That's a showstopper when you look at<br>
something as a PDA replacement.<br>
<br>
Now, with an external speaker, there is no reason for me not to get<br>
the iPod Touch as my next PDA.<br>
<br>
--<br>
David Weintraub<br>
qazwart<img src="/Images/e/at.gif" align="top" border="0" width=9 height=14>gmail.com<br>
]]></description>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 22:09:22 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Web Crossing(r) Unix-v6.0 built Oct  8 2008 13:12:02 (source:1163 2008-09-24 11:42:21 -0700)/Macintosh-OSX-10.4-6.0 (http://webcrossing.com/)</generator>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
</channel>
</rss>
