<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- RSS generated by Web Crossing(r) Unix-v6.0 built Oct  8 2008 13:12:02 (source:1163 2008-09-24 11:42:21 -0700)/-6.0 on 2010-03-20-00.40.33 GMT -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<atom:link href="http://emperor.tidbits.com/webx/.3cb43113/rssFeed/synopsis.xml" rel="self"></atom:link>
<title>TidBITS: Ethics of hacktivating an iPhone</title>
<link>http://emperor.tidbits.com/webx/tidbits-talk</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hey folks,<br>
<br>
It appears that there's a hack application - INdependence - that <br>
activates an iPhone without requiring you to sign up for a two-year <br>
contract or a prepaid plan. In other words, it lets you use an iPhone <br>
for everything an iPhone can do that's unrelated to cellular access.<br>
<br>
&lt;<a href="http://iphone.fiveforty.net/wiki/index.php/INdependence">http://iphone.fiveforty.net/wiki/index.php/INdependence</a>&gt;<br>
<br>
But here's the question - is doing such a thing ethical, given that <br>
Apple and AT&amp;T have priced the iPhone and its plans with the <br>
assumption that everyone will activate using them? Obviously, at the <br>
individual level there's no significant harm to either company, but <br>
if such an approach were to become commonplace, both companies would <br>
suffer for real, and unreasonably so.<br>
<br>
Is hacktivating an iPhone ethical?<br>
<br>
cheers... -Adam<br>
<br>
--<br>
Adam C. Engst, TidBITS Publisher  &lt;<a href="http://www.tidbits.com/adam/">http://www.tidbits.com/adam/</a>&gt;<br>
]]></description>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:10:23 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Web Crossing(r) Unix-v6.0 built Oct  8 2008 13:12:02 (source:1163 2008-09-24 11:42:21 -0700)/Macintosh-OSX-10.4-6.0 (http://webcrossing.com/)</generator>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
</channel>
</rss>
