[F] TidBITS  / TidBITS  / TidBITS Talk  /

Initial iPhone impressions

[McCabe, Steve]Steve McCabe (apparently) - 01:48pm Jul 2, 2007 PST
via email

Well, they're out at last. And what an impression they've made. I was on my
way home from Tampa on Friday afternoon at around half past two, and I
thought I'd stop in at the Apple Store, where I used to work. Already there
was a queue outside the shop of around a couple of dozen, and then as many
more outside the mall. I went home.

The next afternoon, I dragged my wife over to the mall so we could have a
look. We barely got into the shop ‹ I remember working in the Apple Store on
Black Friday and Christmas Eve of 2005, shortly after the video iPods were
released, but I don't ever remember seeing the place that busy. But we
managed to get some quality minutes with the iPhones, and we were duly
impressed. We went home.

And at home, we rehashed what we'd seen. And what we'd liked ‹ which was
plenty. Out came the trusty MacBook Pro, and on the MBP I whipped out a
spreadsheet which spelled out quite clearly to my wife how we could, after
all, afford an iPhone each, even with the rather usurious cancellation fees
we'd have to pay T-Mobile. She bit. And so I went back to Tampa.

I got there at around twenty to nine on Saturday evening; the crowds had
barely abated. The staff appeared to be in constant motion, bringing box
after box of what seemed to be an endless supply of iPhones. The shop was as
busy as it had been shortly after lunch. I snagged my two iPhones and a
hot-pink case for the wife (the black leather holster I'd seen earlier had
sold out). I went home.

Our phones came in rather spanking black bags made of stout card, with
colour printing and silver gilting, this in stark contrast to the naff
plastic shopping bags that AT&T were handing out their (allegedly) very
limited supply in. The packaging, as can be seen across the interweb, is
really quite well done, as one would expect from Apple.

The setup was trivially easy. My wife went first; we connected the phone to
her Power Mac, and iTunes duly launched. We were walked through the steps
for transferring her phone number from T-Mobile, and the process went off
without a hitch. Then we did mine, and by the time we'd finished setting my
new toy up, my wife had received a text message on her phone telling her
that the transfer was complete. Within about a quarter of an hour, we could
both make and receive calls.

Since then, we've both synched our iPhones with our Macs, putting our
contacts on ‹ the contacts viewer is *so* far ahead of any other phone we've
ever seen, including the RAZRs we've just migrated from, that this alone
might just make it worth the price. Our home Airport network (802.11n) works
a treat, with both phones finding it without any problems. We've since
discovered that the EDGE connection is adequate, but far from brilliant, at
least here in Clearwater, but I don't know that we'll rely on it that much.
Sound quality through headphones is exactly what you'd expect an iPod to be,
and while you'd never actually want to listen for terribly long this way,
the built-in speaker (for speakerphone purposes, really) actually plays
music.

Phone sound quality is similarly fine, either through the phone itself or
via the headphones (although hearing my wife's voice in *both* ears on the
phone was a tiny bit odd). The speakerphone is a touch weak, but it's
usable, I suppose.

The YouTube feature has to be the biggest gimmick of all. I've pushed the
button once, just to see what it does, but I doubt that I'll be pushing it
very often ‹ but then, I've never been the hugest YouTube fan anyway.

The keyboard is OK ‹ I'm typing this on my MBP, because I don't know I'd
want to write this much on the 'phone, but I believe that I could write
reasonably long emails and notes if I had to.

The screen, of course, is gorgeous. Photos from my computer are brilliant
and sharp, although the built-in camera (the second biggest gimmick) is,
well, a phone camera.

I've read criticisms about such things as no voice dialling, but I don't
really miss that (although that *really* is a personal preference ‹ I know a
lot of people wanted it). I do wish that Apple had built GPS into the iPhone
‹ and yes, I know that it's my own fault for being an early adopter, that
it'll have it by Christmas ‹ but, again, I can live without it, and I dare
say it would have bumped the price up considerably.

Overall, I'm glad I got my iPhone. I'm still not *entirely* sure that it's
really worth the money I paid for them, but right now I'm enjoying it. It's
an exceptionally well-designed and functional piece of kit, and it's
certainly set the new standard for personal electronics.

Anyone else got one?

Steve




Mark as Read
  (older msg: 9)OutlineAll MessagesOlder ItemsOldest ItemsNewest ItemsNewer Items

Nigel Stanger (apparently) - Jul 16, 2007 2:17 pm (#10 Total: 17)  

Reply to this message
via email - Dunedin, New Zealand  

Photo of Author
Posts: 448
Re: Initial iPhone impressions

On 17/07/2007 7:43 AM, "Alexander Hoffman" <ahoffmanaledev.com> spake thus:

> When you use the trackpad, to scroll with two finger, you move down.
[...]
> The iPhone's interface, however, turns this on its head.

That actually makes a lot of sense. With a "normal" windowed environment,
when you scroll down, you're not moving the window content per se, you're
actually moving the scroll bar, which acts as a proxy for the "real"
document.

With a direct touch environment such as the iPhone or Microsoft's surface
computer, it makes more sense to go to true direct manipulation, where
you're interacting directly with the object rather than by proxy of a scroll
bar or other control. I note that none of the built-in applications appear
to have scroll bars; the closest thing is the progress indicator in the
media player.

--
Nigel Stanger, Dunedin, NEW ZEALAND.
http://xri.net/=nigel.stanger


David Weintraub (apparently) - Jul 17, 2007 2:31 am (#11 Total: 17)  

Reply to this message
via email  

Photo of Author
Posts: 270
Re: Initial iPhone impressions

On Jul 16, 2007, at 3:43 PM, John W Baxter wrote:
> My last two phones before iPhone (AT&T-->Cingular and then Verizon)
> had the on-phone implementation which worked with frustrations; I've
> never used the provider-based version. I only used it for occasional
> from-car calls or for testing new headsets. And I don't plan to make
> from-car calls while moving any more (all the reported studies say
> that the distraction from the process of talking on the phone is as
> dangerous as the distraction from dialing the phone and holding it).

Voice dial is difficult to setup and get working. Of all the people I
know, I'm the only one who actually uses it.

I am also one of the few people who've successfully sync their
computer's address book to their phone, and I have over 1000+ plus
addresses. The reason I use voice dial is due to the poor
implementation of my phone's address book. It takes upwards of 15 to
20 key presses to find the number and to actually dial it. There is a
way to store numbers in categories, so I could put the most used
numbers into a smaller category, but switching categories can take
another dozen button presses.

If I had an iPhone with an easy to use address book, I wouldn't
bother with setting up voice dialing.

David Weintraub



David Weintraub (apparently) - Jul 17, 2007 2:31 am (#12 Total: 17)  

Reply to this message
via email  

Photo of Author
Posts: 270
Re: Initial iPhone impressions

Thought this one was interesting: <http://machinist.salon.com/blog/
2007/07/13/return_iphone/>
Why I returned my iPhone.

He clearly explains his reasons why the iPhone wasn't for him, but
you can tell he did really like it.

David Weintraub



Lewis Butler (apparently) - Jul 17, 2007 2:31 am (#13 Total: 17)  

Reply to this message
via email  

Photo of Author
Posts: 1136
Re: Initial iPhone impressions

On 16-Jul-2007, at 10:35, Jeffrey McPheeters wrote:
> Voice dialing, by and large, is poorly implemented and for Apple to
> add it to the iPhone, and meet their high expectations, AT&T would
> need to revamp their entire system, which would also impact all
> existing users of other types of phones.

What?

Voice dialing has nothing to to with the carrier, it's purely a
function of the phone.

My motorola I record my voice saying "Home" and when I activate the
voice dialing and say, "Home" it dials my home number. When I say
"John" it dials "John" and when I say "Moose" it dials my friend George.

Lewis Butler (apparently) - Jul 17, 2007 2:31 am (#14 Total: 17)  

Reply to this message
via email  

Photo of Author
Posts: 1136
Re: Initial iPhone impressions

On 16-Jul-2007, at 13:43, John W Baxter wrote:
> (all the reported studies say that the distraction from the process
> of talking on the phone is as dangerous as the distraction from
> dialing the phone and holding it).

Are these distractions any more than having a passenger in the car
and talking to them?

I highly doubt it.

How about the distraction of talk-radio?

I bet not.

Lewis Butler (apparently) - Jul 17, 2007 2:31 am (#15 Total: 17)  

Reply to this message
via email  

Photo of Author
Posts: 1136
Re: Initial iPhone impressions

On 16-Jul-2007, at 13:43, Alexander Hoffman wrote:
> The iPhone's interface, however, turns this on its head. Rather than
> viewing a document or list through a window and moving that windows
> through the document, the iPhone's paradigm is that you are touching
> the document itself. So, to move your view down, you flick the list
> up. To move your view to the right, you flick the image to the left.

For some reason, it makes sense to me.

On the touch screen, you ARE touching 'the paper' and it makes sense
that a flick 'up' moves the document 'up' which means you see the
'bottom' of the list.

On a trackpad, you aren't touching the (albeit virtual) paper, and so
a move 'up' the pad makes sense that you are moving 'up' the
document, even though it means the document can be seen as moving
'down'.

And yes, I was surprised. The only time I get it wrong is if I try
to 'slide' the slider on the side, then I think it should move down
when I slide my finger down the right edge.

dr (apparently) - Jul 18, 2007 2:39 am (#16 Total: 17)  

Reply to this message
via email  

Photo of Author
Posts: 514
Re: Initial iPhone impressions

Google Kreme wrote:
> On 16-Jul-2007, at 10:35, Jeffrey McPheeters wrote:
>> Voice dialing, by and large, is poorly implemented and for Apple to
>> add it to the iPhone, and meet their high expectations, AT&T would
>> need to revamp their entire system, which would also impact all
>> existing users of other types of phones.
>
> What?
>
> Voice dialing has nothing to to with the carrier, it's purely a
> function of the phone.
>
> My motorola I record my voice saying "Home" and when I activate the
> voice dialing and say, "Home" it dials my home number. When I say
> "John" it dials "John" and when I say "Moose" it dials my friend George.
>
The major carriers offer it as a service. Some disable it on (some of?) their phones. As best I can tell Sprint offers it as a fee service but if it's designed into the phone they do not disable it.

My Samsung M500 has it built in. This is a tiny flip phone. You have to read about 130 phrases to it to train it. After that it's fairly good with the middle grade bluetooth I use in the car. I do have to turn the radio down speak clearly and have the windows up if moving. And it has trouble with some of he company names I have in the directory. It usually gets what I say but confirms them back with so odd pronunciations. And I really have to mangle my daughter's nickname for it to know who she is. "Lise" (No it doesn't rhyme with lice but my phone thinks it does.)


As to folks saying the iPhone CPU might not be up to the task, I don't buy it. The iPhone has 10 times the CPU that my phone has.

David Ross

mmatty (apparently) - Jul 18, 2007 2:39 am (#17 Total: 17)  

Reply to this message
via email  

Photo of Author
Posts: 397
Re: Initial iPhone impressions



On Jul 17, 2007, at 5:31 AM, David Weintraub wrote:

> On Jul 16, 2007, at 3:43 PM, John W Baxter wrote:
>> My last two phones before iPhone (AT&T-->Cingular and then Verizon)
>> had the on-phone implementation which worked with frustrations; I've
>> never used the provider-based version. I only used it for occasional
>> from-car calls or for testing new headsets. And I don't plan to make
>> from-car calls while moving any more (all the reported studies say
>> that the distraction from the process of talking on the phone is as
>> dangerous as the distraction from dialing the phone and holding it).
>
> Voice dial is difficult to setup and get working. Of all the people I
> know, I'm the only one who actually uses it.

On the original clunky cell phone I got about 6-7 years ago, voice
mail was simple to set up and use, and I used to use it a lot.

The cell phone I got about a year ago (and LG), as with one I use for
work (Samsung), make it so difficult to configure voice dial. It
doesn't work well even after jumping through burning barrel hoops to
get voice dial working. So I stopped using it.

I also find it a pain to have to do a lot of key pressing to get to
the address book, then to scroll around to locate a number. However,
it is much easier to access the web, download ring tones, and other
activities that incur additional charges. I suspect this has a lot to
do with why features that are free aren't given priority when it
comes to accessibility.

Marilyn



  OutlineAll MessagesOlder ItemsOldest ItemsNewest ItemsNewer Items


 [F] TidBITS  / TidBITS  / TidBITS Talk  / Initial iPhone impressions




Add a message

To add a message to this discussion, you must be a registered user. Enter your email address below. If you have an account associated with the email address you enter, you will be prompted for your password. If not, you'll be able to create a new account with no fuss.

Enter your email address:

Submit