Sponsored in part by... Smith Micro StuffIt Deluxe 12: breakthrough compression of MP3 files, PDFs,
iWork and MS Office files! Reduce JPEG file sizes with no loss in
quality, burn to CD/DVD, back up archives to iDisk and more. Buy
today for only $59.99! <http://www.stuffit.com/mac/deluxe/tb/>

 [F] TidBITS  / TidBITS  / TidBITS Talk  /

Snow Leopard

[jwferman]jwferman (apparently) - 02:25pm Jun 21, 2008 PST
via email

Actually, I am stumping for "Meow."

John Ferman
jwfermanties2.net


Mark as Read
  OutlineAll MessagesOlder MessagesOldest MessagesNewest MessagesNewer Messages

George Wade (apparently) - Jun 22, 2008 2:05 pm (#1 Total: 2)  

Reply to this message
via email  

Photo of Author
Posts: 187
Re: Snow Leopard

Somebody, somewhere, mentioned Snow Leopard as having catering to
multiple processors in it's dream list of perfections. Might that
mean something absolutely terrifying: like 64 or 128 intel
processors on a daughter board, more or less efficiently stalking
it's tasks at 50 to 100 times the speed of a single processor ?

It would need water cooling. Diverted to the dishwasher and laundry
in these modern times ;-) of course. Or is it just a shocking
nightmare for us who only have a 'One Meow Intel Solo ?'
George

Lewis Butler (apparently) - Jun 23, 2008 12:17 am (#2 Total: 2)  

Reply to this message
via email  

Photo of Author
Posts: 1136
Re: Snow Leopard

On 22-Jun-2008, at 16:05, George Wade wrote:
> Somebody, somewhere, mentioned Snow Leopard as having catering to
> multiple processors in it's dream list of perfections. Might that
> mean something absolutely terrifying: like 64 or 128 intel
> processors on a daughter board, more or less efficiently stalking
> it's tasks at 50 to 100 times the speed of a single processor ?

We will be seeing 16 core machines very soon, and 32 core ones in the
not to distant future. I would not be surprised to see a 10.6 Xserve
with 64 cores in the next two years.

> It would need water cooling.

Really depends on the size of the enclosure. Chips are getting much
more efficient (read, cooler). The question is, would a 64 core
machine at---say---1.8Ghz each be much more efficient than a 32 core
machine at 2.5Ghz each?




  OutlineAll MessagesOlder MessagesOldest MessagesNewest MessagesNewer Messages


 [F] TidBITS  / TidBITS  / TidBITS Talk  / Snow Leopard




Add a message

To add a message to this discussion, you must be a registered user. Enter your email address below. If you have an account associated with the email address you enter, you will be prompted for your password. If not, you'll be able to create a new account with no fuss.

Enter your email address:

Submit