Hi guys,
I've just listened to this thread for a while, but now I'd like
to add my two cents. Although I'll try to keep my statements
as unbiased as possible, please be aware, I am speaking for Ergonis,
the manufacturer of Typinator. ;-))
Please find excerpts of previous postings below with my comments
inserted:
> I'm a fan of TextExpander myself. There's a couple things I like
> about it:
> It can use both an internal dictionary and an external file.
You can have several sets with Typinator, this is even more
flexible than _ONE_ internal dictionary plus _ONE_ external file.
E.g., if you are already using these TextExpander's two locations
for existing snippets, where would you then put the Autocorrections?
You would have to put different things into the one container file.
Typinator can maintain an arbitrary number of sets. You can
assign different Application settings to sets and you can
can reorder sets to assign priorities.
> I keep that file synced between multiple computers (work/home) but
> keep other
> things in the local dictionary so when I type "sig" at work it puts in
> my work email signature and "sig" at home is my personal signature.
You can synchronize Typinator sets as well (these are just files in the
Application Support folder). Again, even a bit more flexible,
since you may have an arbitrary number sets and decide
which ones to sync and which ones you don't sync.
BTW, you can sync Typinator's data files even while
Typinator is running and it will realize the changes immediately.
> It has programmable entries (I think the others might too) so you can
> insert the clipboard contents into your snippet and even set the
> cursor where you want it to go. Very nice.
Typinator offers this feature as well.
> You can make your entries case sensitive, case insensitive, or copy
> the case of the original. I like that a lot.
Typinator offers this feature as well.
> TypeIt4Me's feature list has a fairly objective breakdown of the
> feature differences between TypeIt4Me, Typinator and TextExpander.
Unfortunately this list is not accurate since it compares to
Typinator 1.6.
The comparison at SmileOnMyMac's web site is more accurate:
http://www.smileonmymac.com/textexpander/compare.html
But I would recommend not to decide based on list of features.
Instead I encourage you to make use of the big benefit of
Shareware - Try before you Buy.
I can only second Diane's statement.
> What's so great is there are at least 5 Mac auto completion
> application that
> we can test and choose the one that fits our personal needs.
I therefore encourage you to download Typinator and give it a try.
Last but not least:
Typinator is definitely significantly cheaper than the other two apps.
Let me add some common information about our products:
The following is not only true for Typinator but also for our
other products PopChar and KeyCue, just to give you a feeling
what you can expect when trying out Typinator:
When we design the functionality and user interface of our products,
it is not our primary goal to outplay any competitors
by the number of features. Instead we try to limit the number
of features to those, we think that most users would really need.
Our main goal is to keep the product as slick and easy-to-use
as possible (hey - we are Mac users after all ;-) ).
The other goal is efficiency and stability.
Typinator's internal engine has been designed to work
with thousands of abbreviations and still expand instantly -
test this against the other tools with a huge set of abbreviations.
I can only recommend downloading and testing the alternatives
to find out which one works best for you and don't get fooled
by long lists of features.
In case of any questions feel free to contact our customer service
at typinator

ergonis.com.
Kind regards
Christoph Reichenberger
CEO, Ergonis Software